Pattern Statement and Process Questions

Unit – Drawing Conclusions
Pattern Statement:  
Explicit information combined with prior experience or knowledge can lead to an interpretation that may or may not be correct.
Process Questions: 
·         What message is the author implying with his choice of words?  What words or phrases make me think so?
·         What facts are related and can be combined to lead to a logical conclusion?
·         What “If…then” statements are implied by some or all of the conclusions?
·         Have I had a similar personal experience?  How does this support a conclusion? [Proficient level question]
·         What fact from another source supports a conclusion? [Proficient  level question]
·         Given an identified conclusion and its supporting facts, does an alternative conclusion exist considering the same supporting facts?  What could it be? [Exemplary level question]
·         Does a different conclusion exist based on additional support considerations? [Exemplary level question]
·         Is there information that could be used to refute any conclusion except the one already drawn? [Exemplary level question]
EXEMPLARY
PROFICIENT
MEETS OBJECTIVE
NOT YET
·   All Proficient descriptors plus…
·          Student either:
a)      reexamines the conclusion and its support, develops a logical alternative that presents a different conclusion based on additional support, or
b)     presents a convincing argument to refute any conclusion except the one already drawn
Note:  The purpose here is not to simply present a different conclusion, but to encourage a different perspective that may bring a deeper understanding of the text by considering all possibilities or recognizing the original conclusion as valid for the purpose of directing further reading
·          Meets objective, plus….
·          Student strengthens support for a conclusion by adding anecdotal evidence from a personal experience or knowledge learned from another source

·          Student combines two facts or a message implied by the author from the text to draw a logical conclusion (i.e., Fact A combined with Fact B logically leads to Conclusion C or Fact A combined with an Author’s Implied Message B logically leads to Conclusion C)
·          Student develops “If… then” statements implied by at least one conclusion, adding notes below the conclusion cloud (e.g., if Conclusion A turns out to be true, the character may try to find the treasure; or, this conclusion, if true, explains why the character acted strangely when the boat appeared)
·          Anything less than meeting the objective


 



 

No comments:

Post a Comment